The table shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998.
The table gives information about the percentage of earnings British people by age and gender spend on food, electronic equipment, music and videos in 1998.
Overall, adults spent the most money on food, but the least on videos, whereas the largest amount of children expenditure consisted of music, but least money was spent on food. Women and men both spent the biggest part of their income on food. On the other hand, boys and girls’ favorite item to buy was music.
With regard of adults’ expenditure, one quarter of their income was spent on food in 1998, but in fact they spent only 5% on videos. Moreover, about 40% and 14% of women and men’s expenditure comprised of food with music being in second place with 5% for women and electronic equipment for men with 10%.
As for money spent by children, there was opposite trend, food being the item on which they spent the least amount of money at 10% for both genders. Approximately 40% of their expenditure consisted of music for both, boys and girls. Boys spent 18% of their money on electronic equipment and videos, whereas girls 5% and 17%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-14 | gur1040894 | 78 | view |
- The table shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 67
- The charts below give information about the electricity generation in two countries in 2009 87
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 93
- The tables show results of 2 surveys done in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city Units are measures in percentage 72
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in European country from 1979 to 2004 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, second, whereas, as for, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79896907216 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45748740394 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1540316493 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154061356395 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763579502109 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557926545009 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100906894844 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154538349135 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.