the percentage of money yearly spent on a nation in UK school in 1981 and 1991 and the expectation for the year 2021
The three pie charts depict the percentage of money yearly spent on a nation in UK school in 1981 and 1991 and the expectation for the year 2021.
In general, most of the school expenditure was used for salaries of teachers and this is expected to continue to dominate in the year 2021, while other sources of spending experienced some changes.
In 1981, wages for teachers accounted for the greatest proportion of total education expenditure at 40%, while the figure for wages for other works was fairly lower, at 28%. Both resources and furniture and equipment made up the same proportion at 15%, followed by insurance at 2%.
In the next decade, there was a slight growth in both the percentage of school spending on salaries of teachers and materials, at 50% and 20% respectively. In contrast, the school paid slightly fewer other workers, at 22%, while this figure and equipment dropped considerably to 5% and insurance made up the remaining 3% of total.
2021 experienced a minimal decrease to 45% in the percentage of educational expenditure for teachers’ salaries, whereas the figure for material books and other workers’ salaries declined significantly to just under 10% and 15% respectively. By contrast, furniture and equipment saw a considerable increase to 23%. Similarly, the smallest proportion of school spending, insurance, also experienced a slight growth to 8% in the same year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...considerable increase to 23%. Similarly, the smallest proportion of school spendi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18340611354 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97844125301 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519650655022 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9400345596 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.888888889 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361420001254 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163749228742 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.236887230422 0.0843802449381 281% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265704087821 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.276430176884 0.0819641961636 337% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.