To succeed in a business, one needs to know maths. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, mathematics is a useful tool widely applied in numerous fields on a daily basis, including running an organization and I am firmly convinced that a solid base of it can help people work spectacularly efficiently and attain important targets.
On a personal level, a business success is partly dependent on the ethics of owners due to several cogent reasons. First of all, one of the most traits employees seek for a good leader is his or her trustworthiness rather than the real capabilities because this determines how much contribution you would like to put in that corporation. Besides, not only tremendous profits but one individual needs to be aware of how important social responsibility is for the development and longevity of companies.
However, what is more practical for running a business is mathematics skills. A leader who has fundamental knowledge of maths can manage the whole operation and make better decisions based on financial reports rather than gut feelings. More specifically, it is essential for every entrepreneur to be competent in principle economic terms like expenses, revenue, accounting and net profit since you definitely encounter them in all kinds of documents from contracts, plans to emails. For instance, a professional executive can set a process so that it maximizes earnings from available resources without excessive investment. Furthermore, the ability to utilize mathematics is dispensible for those working in some specific areas like information technology, engineering and construction.
In conclusion, even though holding high regard for moral standards has a vital role, I couldn’t agree more that the mastery of mathematical calculations for managers will define prosperity no matter if you are a large enterprise or a small shop owner in the long term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...s of documents from contracts, plans to emails. For instance, a professional executive...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41197183099 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23338956419 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69014084507 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.735574419 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.7 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106230768067 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402479998772 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337918788546 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544888594976 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368403340026 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.