SHOULD GOVERNMENT REGULATE THE FAST FOOD INDUSTRIES IN THE SAME WAY THAT REGULATES THE DRUG, ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO INDUSTRIES?
In this day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on the opinion that authorities need to impose restrictions on the fast food industry as strictly as the tobacco, drug and alcohol industries. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this point of view for the reasons below.
Firstly, the consumption of fast food has been more and more increasing across the world among those who do not have quality time to prepare a meal for themselves. As a result, it provides a significant economic boost to a country by that enormous income. McDonald is a prime example, it is a food chain that have many stores being located in almost nations around the world, which receive over a million dollar of revenue each year. Thus, the junk food sector make a considerable contribution to not only economy but also society through tax payment and job opportunities when a fast food restaurant could create employmment for dozens or even hundreds of employees, from waiters and cashier.
Secondly, it is the fact that junk food is not as dangerous for consumers as tobacco, drug and alcohol. Fast food is likely to cause some diseases such as obesity and heart-related diseases, but those can be prevented by doing exercise regularly. Meanwhile, abuse of tobacco, drug and alcohol could make detrimental effects on both health and the stability of community. According to an article of Health Committee, people who overuse alcohol cause the majority of traffic accidents and place the third-rank of those who die because of cancer while the first one is cigarette users.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the government should keep the fast food industry under less strict control than the other sectors including tobacco, drug and alcohol because of the aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-07 | ttree.1602 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...s obesity and heartrelated diseases but those can be prevented by doing exercise regularl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r while the first one is cigarette users In conclusion I firmly believe that the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94276094276 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68002893046 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589225589226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 297.0 20.2975951904 1463% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1468.0 106.682146367 1376% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 297.0 20.7667163134 1430% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 130.0 7.06120827912 1841% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280501024182 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.280501024182 0.084324248473 333% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187503400614 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837798977166 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 150.3 13.0946893788 1148% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -229.98 50.2224549098 -458% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 119.1 11.3001002004 1054% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.85 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.14 8.58950901804 258% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 120.8 10.1190380762 1194% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.