All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks.
Parks are recreation facilities where people can relax themselves. Parks with many trees helps in controlling environmental pollution. It will be good if many cities devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that protect and preserve existing parks.
If many cities follow the above policy, many people will be benefitted. Many people generally go to parks for relaxing themselves. They can perform activities like jogging, walking, playing games in the existing parks. These activities help in improving the health of people like blood circulation in the body increases when people perform these activities. People can just sit and enjoy the nature in the parks. Many trees can be grown in the parks which helps in increasing oxygen levels in the environment and decreasing the environmental pollution. Even birds and animals are also benefitted by the parks where they find more greenery.
If the people do not follow this policy, then there may be chances that people can only find few parks to relax themselves. When there is no funding to preserve and protecting existing parks, then these parks become dirty because of no proper cleaning. When the existing parks are not preserved, then people can no longer go to those parks. In this case, many people cannot find a place to relax and perform their regular activities like running, walking, jogging without any interruption. Oxygen levels in the environment may also decrease as there are fewer trees to protect the environment compared when there are more parks with green trees.
However, all cities need not devote at least five percent of their budgets for preserving parks because of the following factors. The first factor is there are few cities which preserve the existing parks even when there is no funding to programs that preserve and protect parks. Second factor is there may be few cities where only few people prefer existing parks in their city for relaxing themselves or performing their daily routine activities like doing excercise. In the above case, the funding to the programs that preserve parks will be waste of money as many people do not make use of parks.
It will be advantageous for many people and animals if the above discussed policy is implemented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-18 | rishitha981@gmail.com | 58 | view |
- Throughout the country last year as more and more children below the age of nine participated in youth league sports over 40 000 of these young players suffered injuries When interviewed for a recent study youth league soccer players in several major citi 50
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Ten years ago as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard housing near the freeway Subsequently several factories were constructed there crime rates in the area d 75
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 55
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are some more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09408602151 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53895963893 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403225806452 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0209062558 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317439508748 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116584005323 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163678787891 0.0758088955206 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220665924679 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198633296618 0.0667264976115 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.