The bar chart below gives information about percentage of population living urban area in the world and in different continent. Summarize the information and make comparison where relevant.
The bar chart below provides data about world different continent people percentages whose choice of living is cities, the information is about North America, Latin America, Asia, Africa, Europe and world in 1960,2007 and 2030.
If we summarize the whole data in each continent whether its lies in Asia, Europe or America or whole world with passing time from 1960 to 2007 increasing number of people's preference was urban setup, that can also be seen in future 2030.
In Europe and America more than 50 percent population was living in cities in 1960, and in America highest percent was 64 among all regions. While in Latin America and whole world people that are staying in urban areas were 42 percent and 29 percent respectively by 1960. And Asian and Africans were lowest in percent 17 and 15 in 1960.
However, there is drastic change in diverse continents people attitude could shown in 2007, that is more than 70 percent population movement toward cities observed in Latin, North America and Europe 79,72 and 74 percent. Whereas, Asia and whole world population choice to live in urban area was more than 40 percent, 41 for Asia and 49 for Whole world. While Africa was at its lowest once again 37 percent in 2007. And if we look at future scenario developed or advanced regions of Latin and north America and Europe will 84, 87 and 78 percent, that would live in better facilities areas of country. Asia and Africa will also 52 percent and 51 percent by 2030. And if we look whole world into account 60 percent world population will stay in cities by 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-12 | Farwa Nasir | 73 | view |
- The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The map below shows the changes have taken in village Meadowside and Frontor a neighboring by town from 1962 Sumarise information and make comparison where possible 78
- The chart below shows the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information and make comparisons where possible 78
- The map below is the town of Canterbury A new school S is planned for area The map shows two possible sites for school Summarized the main information and make comparison where possible 73
- Some people think the free activities in person s life should be planned while other disagree To what extend do you agree or disagree and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have shown' or 'show'?
Suggestion: have shown; show
...iverse continents people attitude could shown in 2007, that is more than 70 percent p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 6.8 338% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72262773723 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26643217319 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507299270073 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6894680201 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184364655509 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771693605596 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889143360113 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143434863047 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106468574161 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.