The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period.
The bar chart describes the quantity of landline telephones per thousand of the population in different countries from 2000 to 2004.
Looking at the graph, it is clear that the number of landline telephones was by far highest among other nations. Additionally, while numbers tend to fall in countries with the highest level of phone ownership, the figure for countries which had fewer phone owners rose in 2000.
In 2000, the number of landline telephone ownership in Singapore was highest, at about 460 people per thousand. Meanwhile, the figure for Brunei Darussalam was significantly lower, at just 250 people, compared to approximately 80 people in Philippines and Thailand. However, less than 50 people in the remaining countries used landline telephone at this moment.
The period from 2000 to 2004 witnessed a considerable rise in the figure of landline telephone users in Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, with about 30 people. Nevertheless, the figure for the others dropped marginally with approximately 23 people. However, the quantity of landline telephone ownership in Myanmar nearly stay unchanged at about 8 people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-19 | chuc170304 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 937.175257732 103% => OK
No of words: 178.0 206.0 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42696629213 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96086070666 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 290.88556701 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5233281178 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 76.5299724578 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 16.8248392259 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 4.34317383033 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238904441807 0.216113520407 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112140237826 0.0766984524023 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695740743026 0.0603063233224 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160992252128 0.12726935374 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470949776549 0.0580467560999 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 8.37731958763 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 8.71597938144 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.