Pollution and environment damage result from developing and making the country richer.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
The inimical impact done to the biodiversity alongside its irreversible repercussions is believed to be the results of countries’ development policies. From my perspective, I completely agree with the hypothesis as a nation’s growth has demonstrated the capability of dealing critical damage to our nature.
To make a country stronger and more resilient towards the ever-fluctuating economic conditions, the government has to equip its infrastructure with modernized systems. Therefore, industrialized regions have been applied to most regions within a country territory in which they transform the already prosperous and auspicious urban to the indomitable industrial centers and terraforming the countrysides into numerous mass-producing factories. As to make such policies possible, authorities have to deplete the natural resources to fulfill the developing lands. However, the act of mining and converting raw ores into usable ones demand machines that emit polluted air into the atmosphere. Correspondingly with this is the industrial land expansion that alienates the habitats of wild lives, threatening species' population and resulting in widespread extinction.
Both modernization and urbanization can not be possible without a large labor force, which means that immigrants have accounted for the main proportion of a country’s population. This group of people have increased in quantities over the recent decade and does show a sign of recession. However, not only those individuals suffer from the culture shock upon their arrival, but also the biological system there. As the region becomes populated, more food is required and farms are expected to expand. This will likely lead to either deforestation and over-crazing in agricultural parts of a country. Additionally, what seems to more exigent is the augment in human waste. Waste has already been arduous in recycling and disposing terms, yet the can damage nature on a whole scale. The noisome smell pollutes the residential’s atmosphere and can transmit diseases. While the acidification transferred from rivers to destroying aquatic life, it may devise acid rains and deteriorate soil quality. Overall, peerless damage done to the environment.
In conclusion, it can easily be deduced that not the wild animals nor natural disasters can either be responsible or even advocate any damage to the environment as destructive as countries’ development process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-23 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | hoangggggg | 89 | view |
- Some people like to travel outside their country. Others would rather travel to tourist spots in their own country first, before travelling abroad. Which do you prefer to do and why? Include specific details and examples to support your choice. 67
- Nowadays the crime rate is increasing especially among teenagers What are the reasons behind it How can we reverse this trend Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer your writing should be of about 250 words in length 95
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 89
- Nowadays families move to different countries for work Some people think it has a negative effect on children while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today,while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understandhuman's life. 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tionally, what seems to more exigent is the augment in human waste. Waste has already been ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74033149171 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33090985637 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649171270718 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7905247764 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226733624478 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556212611352 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357283429057 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129057639595 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317897159357 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tionally, what seems to more exigent is the augment in human waste. Waste has already been ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74033149171 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33090985637 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649171270718 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7905247764 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226733624478 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556212611352 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357283429057 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129057639595 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317897159357 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.