The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories dunring 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram indicates the number of one nation's exports in different sections between 2015 and 2016 whilst the ratio adjustment of particular categories in exports in two years compared with each other is illustrated.
In general, the export earnings of every product section witness a slight to moderate growth except gems and jewellery due to the decline in this industry from 2015 to 2016. Besides, these categories are divided into 2 groups: the higher (including petroleum products, engineered goods, or gems and jewellery) and the lower (containing the remainders).
In the higher group, the two main exports are petroleum products which went from over $61 billion in 2015 to about $63 billion by engineering goods ($57 billion to $61 billion). This leads to a 3% growth for petroleum products and nearly 3 times more for engineered goods with a percentage of 8.5%. Despite the two categories above, gems and jewellery is evaluated to be one of the highest export section, there is a negligible drop from $43 billion down to about $40 billion with a 5.18% decrease.
Although agricultural items and textiles are supposed to be the lowest categories, they also witnessed an insignificant climb and an overwhelming one respectively. This is recognized in the percentage change in values (2015-2016), both of the sections develop with different growths are 0.81% for agricultural goods and 15.24% for the rest.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-06-16 | LilyWD1814 | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selcting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views a 56
- In the future nobody will buy newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The graph below shows the numer of tourists visiting a particular caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, well, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17105263158 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90694859049 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55701754386 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.9009531678 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.375 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251036253127 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109403723501 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830579390128 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164860495863 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749967850536 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.