Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader. Others think that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views.
In the modern era leadership ability is one of the most prominent skills because people can use that knowledge to manage various groups and teams such as leading family members. In this regard, some people believe that leadership skills are intrinsic, and a person is born with such abilities; however, others hold that opinion which says everyone can gain leadership knowledge using appropriate teaching. I will discuss both ideas in the following and express my own opinion after that.
To begin with, although some people think leadership skills is gifted to someone, it is clear that with a lot of efforts, everything is possible. Indeed, people, who believe that leadership skills is achievable, also believe that all skills are obtainable using endeavors and perseverance. For example, many students learned such skills during their education. There are various courses such as Effective Leadership, Management and so forth that help students to become successful leaders in the future. Moreover, I know many well-known leaderships who admit that they reach their skills using hard-working. Therefore, if someone is enough enthusiastic and persevere, she/he will become a prosperous leader or manager at the end of the day.
Conversely, some people believe that leadership skills are similar to art skills which are talented to someone; therefore, a leader is born as a leader. They claim that having self-confidence, intelligence, strategic mind and more valuable and perquisite characteristics are essential to become a successful leader. So, due to the fact that the mentioned skills are natural and no one can achieve them during the life, leadership skills are gifted to someone naturally.
Personally, I think both opinions are nearly true. Actually, to be a successful leader, someone needs a normal intelligence and abilities to grow it using education, courses, and trial and errors. In other words, a talented leader with a huge amount of intelligence can not be successful without endeavor. On the other hand, without having enough ability, not only can not someone lead a group, but also they can not learn them because their learning rate is low; so, they need unlimited time to become a leader.
To recapitulate, although everything is approximately achievable with having motivation and perseverance, prerequisite talent is also vital because someone who is not enough clever to learn essential information can not become a leader. Consequently, it is my firm conviction that both are required.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-29 | Greenbluemind | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are never satisfied with what they have they always want something more or something different Use specific reasons to support your answer 76
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 70
- One advantage of airships is that for vertical lift the force that keeps the ship airborne they use a balloon that floats rather than an engine Airplanes and helicopters use engines for both vertical lift and horizontal movement but airships use engines s 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One should never judge a person by external appearances 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement all university students should take basic science courses regardless of their field of study 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...nough ability, not only can not someone do such skills, but also they can not lear...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, conversely, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36868686869 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96439694027 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512626262626 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9764904121 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356017593222 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107579012319 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638524991813 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191551203196 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057243044451 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.