The passage and lecture are both talking about high spread of cane toad species from Australia to America with may threaten native animals. The passage claims several solutions to reduce this spread. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, thse metods which are mentioned in article are unsuccessful.
First, the author suggests, building national fence to prevent spreading of toads from Australia. However, the lecturer fefutes this notion, She states, this fence can prevent bmovement of adult frogs. But young and eggs frogs can pass through this fence with water current. Therefore, this solution is not properiate.
Second, the writer elaborate on volunteering to caugh these species, especialy it is easy to capture frogs from their water which is their habitat. This statement is challenge by professor. She says. following toads to caugh them may harm other species because, volunteers can not capture only frogs. They might destroy others. Therefore this suggestion will not solve problem.
Lastly. The author points to developing of virus. She cliams, virus can cause disease and prevent reproduction and growing og toads. The professor contradicts this argument. She says. How can virus which is made in Australia is trasmitted to America. Moreover, frogs conciderd as native species in America. So killing them will effect all ecosystem in the area.
The passage and lecture are both talking about high spread of cane toad species from Australia to America with may threaten native animals. The passage claims several solutions to reduce this spread. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, thse metods which are mentioned in article are unsuccessful.
First, the author suggests, building national fence to prevent spreading of toads from Australia. However, the lecturer fefutes this notion, She states, this fence can prevent bmovement of adult frogs. But young and eggs frogs can pass through this fence with water current. Therefore, this solution is not properiate.
Second, the writer elaborate on volunteering to caugh these species, especialy it is easy to capture frogs from their water which is their habitat. This statement is challenge by professor. She says. following toads to caugh them may harm other species because, volunteers can not capture only frogs. They might destroy others. Therefore this suggestion will not solve problem.
Lastly. The author points to developing of virus. She cliams, virus can cause disease and prevent reproduction and growing og toads. The professor contradicts this argument. She says. How can virus which is made in Australia is trasmitted to America. Moreover, frogs conciderd as native species in America. So killing them will effect all ecosystem in the area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-02 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- Young people occupy a paramount part in societies they responsible on the futue The quention is whether this part of people areinfluntial on their countries they have no impact on their cultures This can be explain in many concepts Admittedly some persons 70
- The reading passage and lecture disccus the possibility to colonize on asterriods The author claims three reasona that explain why it colonization on asteriods are posible The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He mentions no one of these reaso 68
- The internet has neumerous benifits to all aspects of our life especialy with the evolution that occur in the tehnological field Therefor I think government should provide a free internat access for their citizens as other crucial things like roads and bu 76
- The main idea i both reading passage and lecture is presence of bees on earth before 200 million years ago The skeptics in passage claims there were no bees in that time They give several arguments to support their claim However the lecturer refutes these 60
- The reading passage and lecture are both about type of mammels called R robutus The writer claims that R robutus acts as scavangers that sometimes fed on Psittacosaur The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles She mentions that R robutus was an ac 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both talking...
^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaten native animals. The passage claims several solutions to reduce this spread....
^^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...everal solutions to reduce this spread. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fore, this solution is not properiate. Second, the writer elaborate on voluntee...
^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...nt is challenge by professor. She says. following toads to caugh them may harm other spec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... only frogs. They might destroy others. Therefore this suggestion will not solve problem....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his suggestion will not solve problem. Lastly. The author points to developing ...
^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...pecies in America. So killing them will effect all ecosystem in the area.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38073394495 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52855504327 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628440366972 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9172013313 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.7368421053 110.228320801 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4736842105 21.698381199 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447923236816 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115318878454 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155122191419 0.0662205650399 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29034758667 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.298424621064 0.0443174109184 673% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.74 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.