Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Throughout history, people haven't been considerate with preserving the ecosystem due to being selfish for their own needs and convenience. However, after multiple negative consequences that have been affected by human activities, people have started to take notice of the importance of maintaining the environment. The society is developing ways to provide less pollution and it will show its impact after 20 years. The reasons to why I believe this way will be elaborated in more detail below.
First of all, the governments in many countries and influencial companies such as Google have taken into account of the importance in regaining the clean environment. They are providing extensive amount of funding to scientists and researchers in developing alnerative energy sources that are far less lethal to the environment than oil and nuclear power, which is our current primary energy source. Eventually, they found ways to exploit natural resources such as water and wind to generate electricity, and this have been proven to produce less negative components into the air. Moreover, while cars have also been emiting one of the main pollutants in the air, many automobile companies are creating cars that utilize electricity or water to run their engine which does not emit negative components that have harmful impact to the air. As these alternative sources are being widely used in many countries, and are constantly being devleoped to be less harmful thanks to immense funding from big companies and governments, there will be less pollution in the air after 20 years.
Second, through technological advancements, many people are gaining knowledge of how the world is changing. We face multiple videos and news in a daily basis that shows how the ecosystem is deteriorating due to human activities, reasoning the importance of producing less pollutants into the air. Also, as influencial people are advertising their altered lifestyle that provides positive consequences to the environment through social network platforms such as Youtube and Twitter, this motivated multiple others to do the same. Due to this, many people are changing their lifestyles to produce less pollution, such as using less plastic or using transportation instead of using their own car. This will definitely show effect after 20 years.
To sum up, many countries, influencial companies, and general people are being acknowledged with the importance of preserving the environment and are showing effort in doing so. Due to these efforst, after 20 years, there will be less pollution in the air.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-06 | Cookiedough | 73 | view |
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 80
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement No books should ever be banned Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 73
- Claim Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s major field of study Reason Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated Write a response in which you discu 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
Throughout history, people havent been considerate with preserving the ec...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pollutants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., reasoning the importance of producing less pollutants into the air. Also, as influ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32843137255 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89854727697 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504901960784 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6593464124 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.875 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219994392402 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783524749032 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725072250758 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15051189794 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026301676512 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.