Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Our modern world is certainly changing quickly and recent improvements in technology have greatly contributed to our working lives. I disagree with the statement because I think that people nowadays have more opportunities to be happy at work due to improved communication and better career opportunities.
The way that we communicate at work has changed enormously in just a short time and has brought many positive changes to our working lives. A few years ago we had to rely on phone calls, emails and written letters to collaborate with colleagues in different locations. This was frustrating as communication was slower. Nowadays we have many ways to get in touch with colleagues in other places. We can make video calls, use different apps and even work on documents together in real time.
This enhances our relationships with our colleagues, allows us to work more efficiently and also gives us choice about our work location. All these things improve our satisfaction and therefore happiness at work. Although the choice of different communication methods can be overwhelming, the reality is that we do have choice. We can choose which technological changes to take advantage of in a way that
wasn’t possible in the past. So we can use the way that technology is rapidly changing to improve our working lives.
Another effect of the world changing quickly has been felt in our career choices. In the past, it was normal to choose a career for your entire working life. This put a lot of pressure on young people to choose the correct career and to make sure they had the required educational qualifications. I remember talking to older friends who regretted career choices they had made while students but felt they couldn’t do anything to change them. Today, it’s much easier to move jobs frequently and even switch careers. As technology rapidly changes, jobs that didn’t exist a few years ago are created. People who are willing to be flexible can take advantage of these opportunities. They can build on their experience from previous jobs and find something they like to do. If they make the wrong choice, they can move on again. This frequent movement is not seen as a disadvantage in many professions. It’s seen as a way for people to acquire valuable experience and then use that knowledge in their next opportunity. So adapting to these changes allows people to be happier in their working lives and is an advantage for their employers as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97108433735 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86442077434 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503614457831 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7338924583 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9583333333 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2916666667 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165051701386 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487964936244 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519464029154 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973294883993 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051465618571 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.