Much of the food people eat gets transported from farms thousands of miles away. Some believe it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate food from local farmers.
Would the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
As a result of globalization, food sources have been becoming internationally, which is blamed for the noxious repercussions for the environment. A number of people, thus, believe that prioritizing local edibles can be the superior way for environmental situations. This essay suggests an utterance about its pros and cons attached with logical reasons.
Apparently, consuming just the indigenous products can rehabilitate the habitats. Such immense harmfulness that transporting foodstuffs pours out, as the emission of deleterious gases of vehicles has been promoting the process of the greenhouse effect. We have witnessed the scorching heat in some nations such as Canada recently, the USA recently, which causes us alarm about the seriousness of the ongoing issue, rooted partly in transporting food. Not to mention the coal and oil dilapidation, pushing the worldwide energy source into the looming extinction risks. Eliminating numerous miles for wasting energy and poisoning habitats by using local foods, natives not only are able to inhibit the devastating possibilities mentioned above, but also active the local trading to mount stably, while enabling access to cheap, unadulterated products.
By contrast, pausing all of the interstate and international foodstuff shipment is synonymous with many dilemmas that many areas have to confront. Reality shows that there are some cities specialized for a particular function but not agriculture; and cultivating precondition may be not available for all regions of all countries, Japan, Singapore for instance. Hence, food crises will be one of the predictable results if supply chains are congested. Furthermore, it is such a catastrophe for some prestigious restaurants which reserve cosmopolitan delicacies as their signatures. In a bigger picture, the slump of food trading can induce a multitude of negative influences on the national producers, while products are not sold at an as adequate price and bid scale as they should have been. Not to mention the degradation of transport services, which is the main income of a group of people.
In short, turning back on the exporting and importing food or not, is a choice in development strategies of each nation, depending on how they evaluate what is overriding and more worthy, monetary or environmental value
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-23 | vaulzzzzzz | 75 | view |
- Much of the food people eat gets transported from farms thousands of miles away Some believe it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate food from local farmers Would the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 75
- the diagram shows the process of producing avocado oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevants 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 726, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to inhibit the devastating possibilities mentioned above, but also active the loc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 855, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccess to cheap, unadulterated products. By contrast, pausing all of the intersta...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ted products. By contrast, pausing all of the interstate and international foodstuff ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, Japan, Singapore for instance. Hence, food crises will be one of the predictab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in short, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5350140056 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16990562535 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641456582633 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0855308049 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.733333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154223364906 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451651457384 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328309844281 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866506016463 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315989027168 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.