Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to both support and challenge your position.
The success of any work depends on the way we carry out the work. The prompt recommends that luck plays more important role in determining the success of the work rather than the work ethic. However, in my opinion, I reckon that it is the work ethics that plays the majority of the role in determining the success of the work and in some cases-say minority of the cases, luck sometimes plays a normal role.
Firstly, work ethics are set to make sure that any kind of work can be done in the best possible ways. In other words, every office or organization has a set of rules and ethics under which employees have to stand by to make the result more fruitful. For example, most of the offices have rules to come on time and leave the office on time. Every employee was given a task and they must do it within the time limit. Offices and organizations meticulously make some ethics and employee follows, in the same way, to make work effective. It is, therefore, true that ethics of the work play a more important role in determining the success of the work.
Secondly, Work ethic determines the way we work: how we work, when we work, and where we work. When these things are properly taken into consideration, then the viability of the work is possible, and that in turn results in the success of the work. let us take an example: if a company's boss well develops the strategic plan for making the work of his office fruitful by establishing proper rules and regulations like time to instigate the work, location of the work and ways to accomplish work, then it is sure that the outcome will be productive and the company will prosper. It is thus, the ethics of the work is imperative to make the work productive.
However, there are some conditions, maybe sometimes, on which luck plays a crucial role but not always. Let us take a college exam as an example. During exam time, one student may have read all the contents while other student may not have completed every chapter. But the luck may favor the later student, and every question came from only the chapters the student had read. This will help the later student to get an outstanding grade in his result, whereas the former may have mistaken some of the questions and the result will not be on his side. Taking this condition as an analogy, we can say sometimes luck plays an important role to make work effective.
In conclusion, even the luck plays a crucial role in the above paragraph, the ethics of the work far outweigh the luck because luck will not be in favor of anyone every time, however, if one can perform task properly, staying within the limits of work ethics, then it is sure that the work will succeed. Thus, it is clear that work ethics plays majority of roles than the luck.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | hhj | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
- Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons 58
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Y 78
- The table below shows how much time males and females spent per day on non work activities in one European country during 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Let
...urn results in the success of the work. let us take an example: if a companys boss ...
^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...which luck plays a crucial role but not always. Let us take a college exam as an examp...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 489, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t, whereas the former may have mistaken some of the questions and the result will not be on...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, in other words, in some cases, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5129740519 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38894056514 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427145708583 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1654518847 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1904761905 5.21951772744 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246890526902 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990713247051 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800610293886 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169191408942 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635861041758 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.