About me
I was born in Curitiba, one of the coldest capitals in Brazil, located in the south of the country, I grew up in the Christian church where my father was a minister. Even though I wasn't so connected to the church, I became a musician when I was 9 years old I learned and started playing saxophone and guitar.
My childhood dream was to be a soccer player, I won some medals and championships when I was in high school and also in some swimming but that dream didn't come true. After high school, I decided to follow another dream, to develop programs among other things involving computer, I entered the university computer science where I have my degree and my career until today.
My life changed completely during college, I left the church completely, I acquired an apartment where I started to live alone and have my life more independently. This enabled me to proportionate another dream... Travel! I moved to California to get some new opportunities and when I have some time I take a short trip or plan some big trips in the year.
I love rock music, coffee and beers, eating new foods, discovery exotic places and hang out with my friends, especially with my dog in the canyon on sunsets, My principal goal is building a balance between my career and life, I have been work hard to make this goal done and I expect soon this will be my lifestyle and able to expanding my dream to travel around the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-05 | nando0.costa | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...my father was a minister. Even though I wasnt so connected to the church, I became a ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nd also in some swimming but that dream didnt come true. After high school, I decided...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 257.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50972762646 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61855273437 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 618.680645161 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.5200999766 48.9658058833 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.875 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.125 20.6045352989 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0196533309881 0.236089414692 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219732597992 0.076458572812 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058135780922 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0133681386752 0.150856017488 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231542953881 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.