The graphs below show the amount of money spent on protecting crops in three different regions of the world in 2005.
The line chart demonstrates total expenditure on crop protection in three areas namely Africa, Europe and Australia in 2005 in millions. Overall, the protection cost for crops in Africa and Australia showed a rise over the period, while the expense for that of Europe experienced a downward trend.
From the beginning of 2005, the price for protecting harvests in Africa and Australia in millions were 600 and 200 respectively. Africa started with 600 expenditure in January. That was followed by a time of three months when numbers fell to 400, then experienced a rapid surge to approximately 900 and became the domineering category. The sum for that of Africa increased steadily throughout the year, reaching roughly 900 million in December; however, it remained to have the lowest budget compared to others in the end.
On the other hand, in early 2005, the crop’s protection budget of Europe (800 million) was the highest among these three countries. Nevertheless, it steeply dropped to 400, being about 500 less than that of Africa at the end of 2005.
- The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 89
- The graphs below show the amount of money spent on protecting crops in three different regions of the world in 2005 84
- Some think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position Do you agree 89
- The graphs below show the amount of money spent on protecting crops in three different regions of the world in 2005 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07428571429 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7742253929 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6624428774 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16193001522 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739364198865 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627714027466 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124046482345 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513545580046 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.