The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below represents the total amount of calling time in the United Kingdom applying three different calling measures over the period 1995 to 2002. From the graph it is clear that local-fixed line accounted for the greatest proportion among these categories, while mobile remain the least popular line, the national and international-fixed line increased moderately, was the second trendiest type of calling.
In term of the call type using national and international fixed-line began at the number of nearly 37 billion minutes in 1995 then gradually went up until 2001 to 60 billion minutes, means that twice higher than that of 1995. However, there was a slight increase between 2001 and 2002, from 60 to 62 billion to state its position as the second selected call category. With regard to mobile call, there was similar prevalence to the aforementioned line. The quantity of this call type underwent a significant development over an 8-year period, from just over 3 billion to peak at 45 in 2002.
In the inverse trend to the two mentioned call lines, local-fixed line had the fluctuation over the times. The amount of time calling measured by this telephone rise steadily until 1999, with 72 and reach a peak at 90 billion minutes. In contrast, the amount of calling time went down slowly until 2002 when the data mark at 71 billion. Nonetheless, the local-fixed line was the most phone call made in the UK.
In conclusion, the usage of three call categories in England is still following the upward trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | dkhnh_2603 | view | |
| 2022-06-22 | dkhnh_2603 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | chi150901 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 73 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, second, still, then, while, in conclusion, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97254901961 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74549016807 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6009988614 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.272727273 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213779846127 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088532205454 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545150043014 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131006761512 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313743543207 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.