Some people think that it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature, such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views on the importance of classical literature for high school students. Some believe that reading classic novels is a time-consuming activity that does not benefit students at all. However, I partially disagree with this statement due to various reasons that will be mentioned here.
On the one hand, there some evidence of non-necessity of classical books. As the young students are mostly connected with a contemporary language, classical genres becoming old fashioned; due to this phenomenon new generation prefers to read modern books rather than classics. As an example, there are numerous modern writers namely, Asya Lavrovich, John Green whose books more popular than classical ones. Moreover, there are various subjects in school curriculum which are more important than classic literature. In other words nowadays students tend to be specialists of their field, that’s why they are not eager to read classical novels. As an example those who choose to be a doctor are supposed to study biology and chemistry wholeheartedly without procrastination in order to be an expert in the area of medicine, therefore, even reading classical books can be a procrastination.
On the flip side, classics highly important for proper formation of people as wise individuals. First of all, classic novels are written on the basis of real historical events that help us learn something by analyzing historical collapse or accidents. To clarify, they help to learn from the mistakes of others. For instance the book "Crime and Punishment" by Fyodor Dostoyevsky tell us about adverse consequences of rash decision. Besides, characters of the classical books can increase one`s thinking ability. Hence, those who read a lot encounter heroes of various characters while reading; and if they do not like some character, they try to destroy such a nature in themselves. In addition, those who read a lot are distinguished by their broad outlook.
In conclusion, despite the minor disadvantages of classical books, I think that these classic novels have beneficial formative influence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-21 | samdilnura | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | lostsonam | 84 | view |
- Some people think that it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature such as novels and poems To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The benefits of computers in modern society far outweigh the disadvantages What do you think 11
- The government should invest money in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available Do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages 92
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: EAGER_TO[1]
Message: With 'eager to', use the base form of the verb: 'read'.
Suggestion: read
...field, that’s why they are not eager to read classical novels. As an example those w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45426829268 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06951334583 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8871869971 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.235294118 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153018133292 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513596431028 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539969219492 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107509316832 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700019893582 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: EAGER_TO[1]
Message: With 'eager to', use the base form of the verb: 'read'.
Suggestion: read
...field, that’s why they are not eager to read classical novels. As an example those w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45426829268 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06951334583 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8871869971 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.235294118 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153018133292 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513596431028 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539969219492 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107509316832 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700019893582 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.