The following table and graph give information about the gross domestic product (GDP) and employment sectors of a developing country.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The given table and graph present a detailed analysis belonging to gross domestic product and employment sectors of an unknown developing nation. The table depicts precise percentages obtained by distribution of employment and GDP in the year 2004, whereas the graph represents the percentages of GDP from the year 1998 to 2007 in terms of Services, Natural resources and Industry.
From the table, it is clear that there is no particular relation between the percentages of employment and GDP of different divisions. The employment rate or percentage is highest in Natural resources with 77.4 percent, whereas the GDP was higher in Services, particularly in Trade, Restaurants and Hotels with 37.4 percent. Following the majority, the Government services occupies the second highest percentage with 8.7 while the Natural resources acquire this position in terms of GDP with approximately half the percentage of the majority. In the remaining sectors, the employment in Industry and Others division takes up indefinitely one half of the Government employment while the services in Trade, Restaurants, Hotels posses one by twentieth of the employment distribution. On the basis of GDP, The industry and Government display minimal difference with 15.4 and 12.5 percentages respectively exceeding the percentage of transport and communication services by around 6 percent. The least standing is awarded to the Transport, Communication services in employment and Others in GDP.
From the graph, it is derive that the GDP of industry throughout the years is indirectly proportional to the Natural resources and Services. It is worth noting that the Industry sector has maintained a consistent growth with no fluctuations in the time span between 1998 and 2007. The GDP of services decreased at a constant rate from 1998 to the middle of 2002 without any significant changes. From 2003, though very small in scale, the acceleration of decrement increases and resulted in a straight slope travelling downwards. In the case of Natural resources, the GDP decreased gradually without any fluctuations from 1998 to 2004. It increased sharply in 2005 and decreased at the same rate by the end of 2006 and continued decreasing till 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-25 | Sumanayana | 67 | view |
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 64
- Coffee and its processing 78
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'derived'.
Suggestion: derived
...d Others in GDP. From the graph, it is derive that the GDP of industry throughout the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 33.7804878049 198% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 3.97073170732 504% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 965.302439024 195% => OK
No of words: 349.0 196.424390244 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38681948424 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08305194845 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478510028653 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 283.868780488 193% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8053393954 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.285714286 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141505153856 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057361355754 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609337789314 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117902991986 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771736326668 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 40.7170731707 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.