The reading provides some critics against buzzing advertising, which is a tactic that does not let other people know the buzzer is hired to advertise. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that people should know the person who advertises a product is a buzzer because buzzers are paid to advertise a particular product; nevertheless, that situation could motivate them to present incorrect information to the customers. However, the student states that most companies hire a person who really thinks that a product he advertises is good, and the buzzers are really believed in the advantages of the products they advertise.
Furthermore, the passage holds the view that because buzzers are private persons, customers listen to them without any suspicion. In a word, they act off guard for questionable claims and empty descriptions of buzzers. In contrast, the lecturer asserts that people even ask more questions from buzzers than anyone else. For instance, they could ask about the product's price, its related services, and how long the buzzer has been using the product.
Finally, the passage brings up the idea that buzzing brings about distrust in society since if we assume that every person we meet is a buzzer and has been paid to advertise the product that we want to buy, we can not rely on other people's opinions anymore. As a result, buzzing brings about the spread of mistrust throughout the whole society. However, the student states that companies employing buzzers are more trustworthy and open to people because did not trust the company, they could not hire buzzers to advertise.
The reading provides some critics against buzzing advertising, which is a tactic that does not let other people know the buzzer is hired to advertise. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that people should know the person who advertises a product is a buzzer because buzzers are paid to advertise a particular product; nevertheless, that situation could motivate them to present incorrect information to the customers. However, the student states that most companies hire a person who really thinks that a product he advertises is good, and the buzzers are really believed in the advantages of the products they advertise.
Furthermore, the passage holds the view that because buzzers are private persons, customers listen to them without any suspicion. In a word, they act off guard for questionable claims and empty descriptions of buzzers. In contrast, the lecturer asserts that people even ask more questions from buzzers than anyone else. For instance, they could ask about the product's price, its related services, and how long the buzzer has been using the product.
Finally, the passage brings up the idea that buzzing brings about distrust in society since if we assume that every person we meet is a buzzer and has been paid to advertise the product that we want to buy, we can not rely on other people's opinions anymore. As a result, buzzing brings about the spread of mistrust throughout the whole society. However, the student states that companies employing buzzers are more trustworthy and open to people because did not trust the company, they could not hire buzzers to advertise.
- with the help of technology students nowadays can learn more information and learn it quickly do you agree or disagree 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally One cannot learn how to develop it 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement the best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone 11111 76
- movies and televisions strongly influence the way people behave do you agree or disagree 111111 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, for instance, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 276.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15579710145 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56843683587 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539855072464 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6537388218 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.363636364 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381278127273 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146163989153 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171213142677 0.0737576698707 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282633225445 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.285958193574 0.0645574589148 443% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.