The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days

Essay topics:

The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days

The bar graph delineates the extents of film participants in an European country on various days in three years: 2003, 2005 and 2007.

Generally speaking, while the level of individuals visiting the film on Wednesday saw a descending pattern, the figures for other days saw no huge changes throughout the long term. Likewise, people in this nation went to the cinema the most on ends of the week.

In 2003, the level of individuals going to the cinema on Monday was 10%, 33% of that on Sunday while Saturday saw the most elevated extent of film participants (40%). While the figures for these three days expanded by generally 5% in 2005, the last year saw a minimal decay of 3% in each of three figures. In the interim, the figure for Friday stayed stable at 30% after four years.

Beginning at 15% in 2003, the level of film participants on Wednesday continually diminished to 9% in 2007. There were 20% of individuals going to the cinema on Tuesday, higher than that on Thursday by 3% in 2003, after which the two figures saw a small drop of 2%. In the past year, while the figure for Tuesday expanded marginally to 19%, that for Thursday rose significantly by 5%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-21 linhdk35 78 view
2024-10-04 brew 67 view
2023-08-29 chau hoang 73 view
2023-06-24 Ánh Kim 78 view
2023-06-15 dojo 89 view
Essays by user DIEU PHUONG :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tes the extents of film participants in an European country on various days in thr...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66346153846 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56871180272 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524038461538 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1807107541 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141377283911 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606448309554 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610563226533 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100271062842 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546753073937 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.