Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Humanity will be able to drastically reduce the usage of fossil fuels, in the next 20 years. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The number of natural calamities that took place this year, like that the wildfire in the Amazon Rainforest and volcanic eruption in La Palmas Island. The sudden climate changes like snowfall in the desert of Rajasthan, the port explosion in South East, and many more, have made us thought that we should take care of the environment better otherwise humans will face extinction on Earth very soon.
By thinking of saving the planet, the first thing that comes to mind is stopping the use of fossil fuels. Ecologists have suggested that if the use of fossil fuel is abandoned or minimized to the least use then we stand a chance to save the planet. To yield this idea many countries have signed the pledge that in 5 years most of the vehicles in their country will be powered by electric energy. This is a huge step, and the governments are working hard to promote this idea and make people understand the motive behind it. There is a high level of research going on in the field of Electric Vehicles. Elon Musk’s, Tesla is an important example of this which produces the current best affordable electric vehicles in the world. Similarly, rising startups in India competing to design the best affordable two-wheelers have already begun. All these cases prove that it is credible to say that soon there will be drastic use of fossil fuels.
On talking about Elon Musk, we can also not overlook the initiative that Tesla’s manufacturing hubs all over America have switched to 80% solar-powered facilities. Elon who is a social entrepreneur is trying to prove to the world that through dedicated research and motivation we can change the world to become 100% green. Another example that comes to mind is the project of covering a portion of land in the Sahara with solar panels. Research posit that if we cover one-third of the Sahara desert with solar panels then through this we might be able to power the whole world. If this project, in reality, becomes successful to come into play, it will be a huge triumph for humankind.
In conclusion, with the everyday rising temperature of the world and making the planet warmer day by day, we have to find the best solution before it is too late. Lots have people to this realization and contributing in every way possible to them in their capacity to save the planet and make Earth a better place for the future generation. Eliminating the complete use of fossil fuels, which is known to be the major contributor to global warming seems the best possible way to make a huge step to higher our chance of sustainability on this planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-23 | khush.furia | 92 | view |
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Humanity will be able to drastically reduce the usage of fossil fuels in the next 20 years Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 92
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- Nuclear power plants are really devastating for the nature The nuclear waste that is created as a result of fission stays radioactive for thousands of years Also we had several nuclear disasters that have proven how unstable this whole system is There are 83
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, similarly, so, then, third, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73170731707 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54765543734 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525498891353 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1452993728 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.555555556 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0555555556 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124767336246 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421588538248 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425544432652 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709987476573 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357081060701 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.