Today, more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or Antarctica. What are the benefits and disadvantages for people who visit such places?
The dynamics of the world are changing dramatically with the advent of groundbreaking technologies. With the invention of the latest pieces of equipment, it is possible these days to visit places such as Antarctica and the Sahara desert which were quite difficult to explore. There are certain merits and demerits of visiting such places.
First and foremost, many people like to visit adventurous places which are challenging to explore. Most locations of the world are approachable due to globalization and people have a curiosity to move towards those parts of the world which have very little presence of human beings. As a result, they could experience something greatly different and many people believe that visiting such places can have an immense impact on their lives as well. On a further note, many tourists are earning money by making vlogs and documentaries on the places which are not fully explored and still people have a curiosity to know more about places like Antarctica skylights, glaciers, and terraformation of Sahara desert. Visitors make interesting videos for their viewers and run their social media channels.
Conversely, it is very expensive to visit such places as it involves many things to consider before visiting. It may require hiring a helicopter, experts in that area, and the necessary equipment to stay over there for a few days. Therefore, trips to these places require superfluous money which might not be worth it to visit as many other established places are also available to visit instead of these barren lands. Furthermore, it might be dangerous as in case of emergency, it would be difficult to find any immediate help. Consequently, it can be a threat to life for visitors. Rather illustrative examples are mountain hikers who walk towards the peaks of mountains where they have to be fully equipped by themselves and sometimes they lose their lives on the way of their adventures.
The conclusion to be drawn is that many tourists are visiting places like Antarctica and The Sahara desert for the purpose of adventure to explore or filming these areas for their audience, however, it required a lot of money to visit such places and it might be dangerous in case of any emergency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-04 | Kamran2777 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exploring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: exploring
...dventurous places which are challenging to explore. Most locations of the world are approa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...t can be a threat to life for visitors. Rather illustrative examples are mountain hike...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, as for, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80656508971 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50406504065 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8601158549 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372033916015 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121658801564 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991718487335 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24808733334 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439903095962 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.