Some people believe that future planning is a waste of time and should be avoided. How far do you agree or disagree with this?
It is well said that "without planning a life is like a flower without fragrance". Some proportion of masses assert that preplanning for the future is not a prudent approach as it a time-consuming process. Here, I would like to discord with the given statement firmly.
A bunch of points can be mentioned to support my point of view. First and foremost, the role of planning in advance for future is terrific to accomplish desired goals. Many years endeavours are required to attain desired goals. Therefore, a person should make realistic plans before embarking on the journey. Taking the life of a student into consideration, a student who want to become doctor in life is expected to achieve desired what if he or she/has advanced planning as proper planning will help him/her to do hard working in a particular field. Needless to say, prior planning is a imperative as it increases the chance of success.
Further emphasizing on my point of view. Planning in advance plays a phenomenal role to make our future secure. Taking recent example into consideration, during COVID 19 pandemic time many daily wage earners became unemployed which affect not only their lives that also their capability to spend money on their Health. On the other side, people who invested money for future plan benefited from their wise decisions. Consequently, it is necessary to allocate time for future planning activities as advance planning contribution more for the security of our future.
To recapitulate, undeniably sometime the thing do not happen according to plans. However, it is imperative to do planning for future as it is well said that "an hour of planning can save you 10 hours of doing".
- Directors of large organisations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees Some people think it is necessary but others on hold that it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that the effective way to reduce air pollution is to tax companies which cause it Others thik that there are better ways to achieve it discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Nowadays children mostly spend time playing computer games rather than sports what is the reason for this is it a negative or positive development 78
- Many people try to find a balance between their work and other aspects of their life However few actually achieve this What solutions can you suggest 56
- Some people believe that competition as children to be better prepared for their future while others say that competition can be harmful for children and should be invited to adults discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'endeavour'.
Suggestion: endeavour
...to accomplish desired goals. Many years endeavours are required to attain desired goals. T...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eld. Needless to say, prior planning is a imperative as it increases the chance o...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... it increases the chance of success. Further emphasizing on my point of view. Planni...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: ADVANCE_PLANNING[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'planning'.
Suggestion: planning
... time for future planning activities as advance planning contribution more for the security of o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08510638298 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95203341489 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581560283688 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1519049518 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.625 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216081134778 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650104626746 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442051433285 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127675572971 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181691053753 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.