Task 2: Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to the university. What are the advantages or disadvantages of their study?
In recent years, it has been increasingly common to see various high school students take a gap year off before going to academic institutions. This trend would create certain benefits but there will also be several drawbacks.
On the one hand, taking some time off to travel and work before starting university life has several noteworthy advantages effects. The primary benefit is that high school leavers might be dedicated to traveling and new experiences, which enables them to explore their fields of interest to make wise educational decisions. For instance, a plethora of organizations and projects are established to welcome those who utterly want to attend to develop life skills and integrate into society, regardless of age, location, ability, and background. Besides, those taking a year off can enjoy an advantage over their peers with problem-solving and task management skills, which might be ameliorated through such experiences. An additional positive is that a vacation allows students to discover a different culture and meet new hospitable individuals. In particular, it is by traveling school leavers are possible to know diverse traditional costumes, customs, traditional foods, etc and communicate with others in adverse languages.
Despite these aforementioned benefits, several drawbacks do exist. The serious disadvantage of spending a year off is that it may discourage students from continuing their study back. Consequently, they almost lack the motivation and element of competition when studying in college or university, and even their ability to work in a face-to-face group can be greatly decreased. For example, various students have a tendency to spend more time alone to relax after the challenging period with tests and exams so that they will become apprehensive and shy if they commence studying in institutions. Furthermore, a great number of students are finding the work environment more financially appealing and less strenuous, as opposed to having to encounter high expectations and pressure in assignments. Because of this, fewer high school leavers these days are likely to have a job or pursue their passion than continuing for higher education. Additionally, the poor cannot afford to pay tuition fees for the universities while the ordinary family or affluent family has enough budget to pay for institution’s fees and other extracurricular activities for their children.
In conclusion, despite the disadvantage relating to educational interruption, I strongly believe that the advantage in terms of academic orientation and skill development is more crucial. Therefore, high school students should be encouraged if they wish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | nganphuong05 | 89 | view |
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 73
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behavior What action can be taken to prevent from having this problem 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58578431373 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16313524787 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612745098039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3363290967 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.058823529 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283494337453 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723365770122 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541297460149 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134065497146 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07316117001 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.