Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
To assert that we should rescue endangered species only when their extinction is directly related to human activities is a blanket statement that ignores unique approaches. Today, human activities pose a threat to the majority of animals and plants. Humans have destroyed animal habitats and replaced them with big enterprises and industrial zones.
While certain organisms and plants face extinction, they play vital roles in the circle of life. If humans fail to take action to prevent the extinction of these species, the consequences will be far-reaching and irreversible. Humans should, for example, protect plants with critical features for use in the medical industry by taking into account their soil and the amount of humidity they require. These plants require particular conditions to thrive, and keeping them is a smart investment for individuals because they can aid in the cure of a dangerous disease without the use of chemicals.
Also, it's hard to tell if human actions are causing species extinction. Technology and industrialisation affect all species directly or indirectly. Toxic waste dumping and water contamination harm animals and ecosystems. It is the duty of society to repair the damage produced by humans to the ecological system.
Inability to stand has little effect on natural selection. Interfering with inter-species competition can have unintended consequences.
The second factor for species extinction is human activity, particularly in emerging nations with a high concentration of industrial activity. In this age of automation, carbon dioxide emissions and the greenhouse effect are expected to be detrimental to society and virtually all creatures. This is not true if an elephant's natural habitat has been devastated by natural disasters such as hurricanes and tornadoes. The Amazon jungles contain a natural stream, which means that people must protect it. Because it serves as a shelter for a variety of species, not just humans. Another reason the government disregards animal costs is that when a fire breaks out in New York City, no one considers the cost of animal rescue; instead, they think it is a human catastrophe and that nothing can compare to the value of a human life. On the other hand, when a bird is slain, we should feel the same way.
In conclusion, there are numerous species on the verge of extinction, and humans must intervene when they are threatened, not just by human activities but also by natural disasters. This is a critical aspect of our environmental stewardship. Due to the fact that we do not own the house. As a result, society should intervene to protect endangered species only when their extinction is directly related to human activities. Endangered species should have adequate habitat, medical treatment, and food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-20 | jeevansreeram | 50 | view |
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 62
- Some people believe that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit Others believe that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely align 50
- Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complained indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change Furthermore many server 68
- Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse in Palm City but last month we discovered that over 20 000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage Meanwhile the Buzzoff P 73
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fits and cholesterol and today low fat products abound in many food sto 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 312, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an elephant' or simply 'elephants'?
Suggestion: an elephant; elephants
...ally all creatures. This is not true if an elephants natural habitat has been devastated by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32584269663 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96685898567 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54606741573 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9010962554 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229284298049 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576436832665 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041061045339 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112987913543 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492251325121 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.