The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the percentage of households possessing electrical appliances from 1920 to 2019 along with the variation in number of hours invested in household works during that period. In general, as the proportion of houses using the electrical appliances increased till the end of the century, the time involved in doing house works decreased.
Specifically, the ownership of all three electrical appliances increased with rapid surge in use of refrigerator than vacuum cleaner and washing machine. Refrigerator usage increased to 100 % within 60 years and continued to its culmination afterwards. The utilization of vacuum cleaner also raised in a linear way from 30 % to 100 % between 1920 and 2000 AD. Similarly, the households also used washing machine displaying a growth from 40 % to around 75 % in the century of the study. However, the increase is not as steep as it is for other two appliances.
Furthermore, the number of hours per week of house works decreased during this time. The reduction was quite rapid between 1920 to 1960 when it came down to 20 hours from 50 hours per week. The time after 1960 saw a gradual reduction to 10 hours per week. The cause of decrease could be credited to the surge of electrical appliances' usage.
In an interesting note, a small decrease of 10 % is seen in the usage of washing machine from 1960 to 1980. However, the decrease in time allocated to chores is not abnormal in this gap. So, it could be inferred that use of washing machine did not have any significant role in the reduction of time invested in house works in comparison to refrigerator and washing machine.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 73
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 66
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a linear way" with adverb for "linear"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ilization of vacuum cleaner also raised in a linear way from 30 % to 100 % between 1920 and 200...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...gradual reduction to 10 hours per week. The cause of decrease could be credited to ...
^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
... be credited to the surge of electrical appliances usage. In an interesting note, a small...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92363636364 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84938510094 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498181818182 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4326726845 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146114385609 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502184997662 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454761846704 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944587130069 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583157719896 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.