The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Mobile phones have become one the crucial needs of people in today world. But, some individuals opine that due to unseen damages that mobile phones cause its use should be banned in certain places like smoking. I disagree to the point that mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking and imposing a ban might be beneficial.
Overall, though there are certain drawbacks of mobile phone uses on environment and people, the fact cannot be overlooked that this invention has changed our lives completely as it has become one of the easiest way of communication. We can manage our calls and play games over phones whenever we want in public and it won't even cause any nuisance. Whereas, if we smoke in public it might offend people due to several bad effects it has on respiratory system and the person might suffer from these adverse effects. Therefore, smoking is usually banned in public areas.
On the contrary, mobile phones do have numerous effects on human health which cannot be ignored. Radiation emitted from the phones can harm our brain and damage our system in several ways but, there are solutions to prevent radiation and protect the public unlike smoking which doesn't have solution. We cannot ban the use of mobile phones in every public areas like smoking but in silent zones like places of worship or some interior areas to preserve their natural resources we can impose ban on their usage.
In conclusion, the application of mobile phones in our daily life can be controlled by ourselves by taking initiative but imposition of ban is not an option we should consider as it might become hectic for people to manage their routine.
- the dangers of smoking are well known yet many people continue with this habit What are the causes of this How can we reduce smoking in society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should 73
- some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money Discuss both views and give your opini 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 84
- Some people think that government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of mobile phone uses on environment and people, the fact cannot be overlooked th...
^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...protect the public unlike smoking which doesnt have solution. We cannot ban the use of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, therefore, whereas, as to, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88256227758 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43086288446 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9728012855 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.727272727 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346971148647 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15338218136 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866048017539 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234342559803 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913973784637 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.