The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists or scientist but the general well being of the people.
A nation is comprised of people. Every one live together as a society and depend on each other in one way or the other. Talking about the factor that makes the nation shine, it is definitely its citizens since without them there is nothing that can be called a country.
The accomplishments of the rulers, scientist and artists are in all aspects benefits the concern individual most rather than being useful to the society as a whole. This is why it cannot be regarded as the victory of the country altogether. One rice is enough to test whether the food is cooked but such is not so in human kind. The apex reached by precocious few is no guarantee that the same in the nadir lives well. The success of them can be construed as the enormous opportunity that one could make use of or it can be portrayed as inspiring hard work of the individual but nevertheless the exalt of the state.
In support of the given statement, one could take Israel as an example. Israel is known for its very strong and bold leaders from its beginning in 1948. The leaders proved their capability by establishing ‘MOSSAD’ an integral surveillance team which is best of its kind. It is known for its culmination in scientific technologies and innovations and also their films are patronized as some of the rarest gems. All these did not put Israel on top of the charts in all indices. They are still behind much smaller European nations. The root cause is that these merits has not done anything to the welfare of its dependants
.
One cannot neglect the other side of the same coin. There are artist whose works have healed many. Selfless innovations by many thinkers has relieved a myriad people from their lugubrious life. The policy made by honourable rulers has changed the life entirely for uncountable ones. Such achievements are mandatory to be acknowledged as the welfare of people provided only few of them can be highlighted through indices
.
The argument can be bolstered further by the factor of how much it drips to the people from the top. The greatness reached by the nation’s aristocrats reflects the welfare of the people only when it is contributed for the same. Unless the achievement is measured by its dedication to its subjects, all the glories will be superfluous. They will never reveal the goodness of the subjects it is filled with. But it is true that such scale of measurement is not quotidian .Therefore the statement is true and correct once and for all.
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 83
- The table below gives information about past and projected population figures in various countries for different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 90
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
A nation is comprised of people. Every one live together as a so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...s inspiring hard work of the individual but nevertheless the exalt of the state. In support o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...work of the individual but nevertheless the exalt of the state. In support of the give...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ything to the welfare of its dependants . One cannot neglect the other side of t...
^^
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...them can be highlighted through indices . The argument can be bolstered further ...
^^
Line 9, column 468, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ch scale of measurement is not quotidian .Therefore the statement is true and corr...
^^
Line 9, column 470, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... scale of measurement is not quotidian .Therefore the statement is true and correct once ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... scale of measurement is not quotidian .Therefore the statement is true and correct once ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, talking about, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73672055427 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68741040033 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531177829099 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.675056561 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.04 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.32 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264108590942 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578576014736 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561124698504 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130953310393 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430614807855 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.