Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
The development of scientific technologies over the last 50 years has changed our lives to more convenient and effective. Hoping for a further positive evolution of our daily lives, there are some people who insist that restrictions on scientific research and development have to be minimized. However, my opinion is a lot different from theirs. I believe that a certain level of government restrictions is required for the following reasons.
Firstly, science is too close to the borderline of human beings’ safety. Especially for those research and development in medicine, they can directly affect our health; thus, many restrictions have been on them. For example, when developing vaccines, they should meet strict requirements, including long-term test results for various groups (i.e., male and female adults, children, and the elderly). The main reason for its strictness has originated in the awareness of its possible dangers. Thus, with consideration of the possibility that new scientific development causes dangerous effects on us, I would like to say restrictions should exist.
Secondly, some scientific research and development include national secretes. Many of the studies conducted by national research institutes are directly related to the power of nations. For example, space-rocket-related technologies can be easily converted to developing missiles. Therefore, those technologies are kept confidential to outside or other countries with strict regulations by governments. If there is no restriction to share the technologies with others, it will result in the loss nation’s power. It demonstrates the importance of setting restrictions on scientific research and development. For this reason, I support the necessity of restrictions on scientific studies.
It is true that restrictions on scientific studies may hinder scientific technologies from further evolution. However, as they are strongly related to our safety and sometimes include secrets of our nations, I insist that restrictions on them are required at a certain level.
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country 68
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 58
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 50
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this research' or 'those researches'?
Suggestion: this research; those researches
...of human beings’ safety. Especially for those research and development in medicine, they can d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73529411765 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31675519927 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565359477124 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7914483889 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298941624959 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098585086901 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771498230299 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186962136139 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376565478044 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.