Should children receive money to do household chores or should they be taught that this is an unpaid responsibility? Discuss your opinion.
In kids’ fledging stages of maturity, harnessing skills for future careers is of paramount importance, and doing housework is also a good way to do that. For this reason, parents are inclined to get their children to roll up their sleeves and take on household chores. While some parents motivate their kids to do so by paying them money as a reward, the opponents maintain that children must be responsible for doing those work. From my perspective, they should not be paid for doing housework.
First, children’s gaining internalized impetus for daily chores is critical. it appears that drilling the responsibility to do housekeeping into people cultivates their self-discipline and spontaneity. In the long run, they will become fully aware of their responsibility and seduce themselves into helping with chores properly, seeing that as an obvious way to fulfill their onus. Moreover, self-discipline and inner motivation derived from their free contribution to housework can enhance kids’ dutifulness, which will gradually produce a fertile breeding ground for success.
Some people maintain that money can be a reward for them after their contribution to housework, as it will make them more devoted to housekeeping. However, what this argument fails to consider is that paying them after doing chores can be considered bribery for their laziness and pragmatism, which gradually imprints negative materialism on their minds. To exemplify, children with a small reward after having fulfilled duties will value their time and effort over money, and in the worst-case scenario, they will no longer desire to dedicate freely, such as doing charity or volunteer work. In this point of fact, it is critical to instill children with the onus of carrying out housework.
To reiterate, successful kids are those who internalize all the work that should be done. For this reason, they should be taught to do chores without being paid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...d impetus for daily chores is critical. it appears that drilling the responsibilit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33116883117 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89759585354 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6048030708 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27152635284 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113021482103 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913657875765 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198088390163 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089318443457 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.