Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teachers ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion
The learning and teaching process also englobes an appropriate environment with students and teachers relating respectfully and well. Although this good relationship is important, I strongly refute the idea that teacher’s ability to relate well with students surpass the importance of excellent knowledge. I fell this way for the following reasons.
Firstly, if teachers do not pose high level of knowledge the students will not be able to learn effectively, consequently, they will not excel high grades at school or at university. Besides, they will not have knowledge enough to develop critical thinking, broad conceptual ideas and special skills, which are basic aspects of learning process.
Secondly, once these students become professionals, serious consequences may happen for the society. For example, if an engineer wrong plan a highway due to his lack of knowledge or skills, terrible accidents and a lot of deaths may happen. Furthermore, the lack of qualified workforce would promote nefarious impacts on local and global economy, which could lead to starving, unemployment and increase in overall prices.
Finally, it is known that the most reputable educational institutions around the world have great faculty members with high knowledge, skills and curriculum. High knowledge stimulates the advance of science and new discovers, which impact the society directly. For example, the development of new drugs, treatments and all scientific discovers which impact our lives depend on excellent professors who teach students to excel their best skills.
To sum up, I strongly believe that although the ability to relate well is important, it is not more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Because, it is the driven force of learning process and development of skills necessary to society welfare.
- 3)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - altruist behavior 3
- Chevalier memoir 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ls, which are basic aspects of learning process. Secondly, once these students becom...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 282.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58156028369 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92244195297 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5636325299 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251260014681 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855102391119 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991791288588 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141027999045 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957621635769 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.