The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries in 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare proportions of three electric sources was used for construction in 5 years between 2003 and 2008.
It is clear that fossil fuel was the highest figure in Vietnam and Indian whilst hydro power was the highest proportion of the electric sources in Morocco and Sweden. However, nuclear power did not appear in Vietnam and Morocco.
In Vietnam, fossil fuel was used mostly and hydro power was not so common as fossil fuel accounted for 56% and 44% respectively. However, in Morocco, fossil fuel was not the most popular, the most popular percentage was that hydro power with 95%, followed by fossil fuel at 5%. In Indian, fossil fuel was the highest figues comprised 82%, followed by hydro power with 14% and nuclear was the lowest proportion with 4%.
In Sweden, it was the same as Morocco, the percentage of hydro power was the highest with 52%. The figure of nuclear power was higher than the proportion of hydro power at 44% and 2% respectively and hydro power was the lowest percentage in this country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-27 | Taytor2609 | 11 | view |
- Topic The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 65
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 70
- The plans show how a coastal land has developed into a coastal park 71
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78770949721 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39550831725 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441340782123 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7824266948 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0383919007355 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028519591276 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579309343885 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541741336801 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716230797696 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.