The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation techniques in forest protection is the best way to protect the world’s forests and hopefully reverse negative trends that imperil our forests. Using the internationally established forest protection fund to protect forest agriculture is perhaps the most important initiative. Dispersing these funds to governments, land owners, and farmers will allow them to resist intrusions by the logging industry, oil companies, and property developers who are after their land. This is a very specific initiative that will help agricultural areas from being developed into environmentally damaging industries and ensure that agricultural farm use is uninterrupted. A second use of this protection fund could be used to develop the economies of villages and tribal communities located in forest areas. By parceling out funds to provide villagers and tribal residents of forests with a stipend will help these people continue their way of life and resist pressure to convert their forest land to the above mentioned industries. Providing living stipends and other financial aid to forest residents will help people afford education, health services, and nutritional aid so that they are less tempted to resort to destructive or exploitative forest practices to make a living. Much of the global concern with deforestation focuses on the alarming loss of biodiversity. Humans use thousands of species of plants and animals on a daily basis for food, shelter, clothing and medicinal needs. Deforestation threatens species that humans rely on for these essential services. Using the international fund to help governments and people establish protected forest areas is the best way to maintain valuable forest biodiversity and protect species from exploitation, endangerment and extinction.
xxx
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-02 | ellen87713 | 90 | view |
| 2022-03-09 | Alia Mahbob | 80 | view |
| 2020-09-13 | andrewchiu1203 | 81 | view |
- TPO 34 integrated writing task
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- In times of economic crisis in which field do you think the government can cut financial support A art B Scientific research C parks and public gardens 70
- Experts suggest that no more than two hours of screen time per day for children under 13 Do you think is a good idea 80
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia It was described in 1741 by Georg W Steller a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see one In 1768 the animal became extinct 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ment of an international fund will help developing countries to protect the forest, but th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the lands') or simply say ''most lands''.
Suggestion: most of the lands; most lands
...d owners in forest. He illustrates that most of lands in the forest are owned by government i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60550458716 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19111794432 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614678899083 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8874690335 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.090909091 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170851324915 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674629220076 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987517554828 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101995865301 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867607056894 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.7273730684 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.