The chart shows the water levels in reservoirs of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and October 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the standard of water in reservoirs from various countries in Australia during October of two different years, 2009 and 2010.
It can be seen from the chart that there was a significant improvement in the amount of water throughout these nations, except for cities 1 and 4. Besides, the level of water came worst in Melbourne, as opposed to the safest criteria shown in Cambena
Looking at the chart more closely, in 2009, cities 3 and 5 kept position as the lowest point in the chart, persistently under 50%. In contrast, areas 2 and 6 witnessed noticeable data, at nearly 75%. In the following year, there was a slight increase in region2 compared to the dramatic rise in both city 5and city 6. The water level of the reservoir in city 6 contained by far the most, reaching its full capacity.
The amount of water in cities 1 and 4 was around half of their reservoirs. The gap widened between two years in Darwin when it plunged by nearly 15%, yet, the data in city 4 remained stable at 55%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrates the standard o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 4 was around half of their reservoirs. The gap widened between two years in Darwin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5597826087 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55787799539 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8892523496 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2456394329 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994312589811 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762079928991 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147911933279 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720121232852 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.