The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain. The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
The given table illustrates the police budget between from 2017 to 2018 on a Britain area while the pie charts show the distribution of these money.
It is clear that all of figures on the table increased and the amount paid to National government was the highest in both of years. In addition, while salaries and technology rised slightly, the expense of building and transport were unchange, salaries accounted for more than half of the budget for two consecutive years.
In term of the table, national government was the highest source of budget in both of years with 175.5m in 2017 and 177.8m pounds in 2018. Followed by local taxes with a significant increase, accounted for 91.2m pounds in 2017 and 102.3m in 2018. Other sources was the lowest figure with 38m and 38.5 in two years respectively, almost 150m pounds lower than the highest figure.
On the pie charts, in the year 2017, salaries was the highest distribution of this budget with 75%, took up 3/4 of the total budget. The percentage of buildings and transport were higher than the proportion that of technology comprised 17% and 8% respectively. In next year, the figure of salaries decreased almost 10%, it comprised 69% exactly but this number was still the highest proportion. The number of buildings and transport were unchange with 17%, still higher than the percentage that of technology with 14%.
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things What is your opinion 74
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...the pie charts show the distribution of these money. It is clear that all of figures on t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92672413793 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60695342371 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.5934455592 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.3 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205738669465 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951853763567 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146734304776 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181860598417 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.193754213797 0.0819641961636 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.