The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
Given are two maps delineating the transformations of a residential area running along coastline in Darwin during a phase of 5 years, commencing from 2009 till 2014.
It is perceptible that the region experienced exponential alterations with the elimination of industrial areas as the main feature along with the addition of myriad amenities.
Over the mentioned years, the north of the map seemed barely modified except for the replacement of a swimming pool for the industrial zone which was encircled with a lake by a footpath. Meanwhile, the other amenities such as a conventional center, a school remained unchanged along a curved T-junction lining up from west to east and finishing at a fishing area.
Moving south, the manufacturing area was covered by more trees alongside a footpath after a 5-year renovation which led from the very left lane to the eastern harbor. In addition, three more residential buildings were constructed behind former ones simultaneously with a school to their west.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-12 | Hồ Phi Long | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows how oil is extracted in the production of perfume 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, except for, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 5.05154639175 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 937.175257732 90% => OK
No of words: 161.0 206.0 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25465838509 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12497058356 2.54303337028 123% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 127.690721649 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.689440993789 0.622605031667 111% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 290.88556701 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 19.4143417778 44.8134815571 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 141.0 76.5299724578 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 16.8248392259 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 4.34317383033 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11078986417 0.216113520407 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522147267792 0.0766984524023 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550000552585 0.0603063233224 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703450885224 0.12726935374 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589163508645 0.0580467560999 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 8.37731958763 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 70.7449484536 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 8.71597938144 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 7.59969072165 132% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 8.62886597938 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.