Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies
Violence is an issue that has recently emerged and tends to get worse in places like kid-friendly playgrounds. In order to deal with violence, it is advised that parents teach their young children not to fight back when being attacked by bullies. This idea will be covered in more detail in this essay.
First of all, we will look at the arguments in favor of not having kids retaliate against bullies. This viewpoint is mostly motivated by a desire to ensure the safety of children. Retaliation could escalate the conflict and cause significant harm or even death. The kids must understand that sometimes it is impossible to hit back at bullies. Fighting back nearly always does the children additional harm, especially when there is an imbalance in the number of persons or in their physical power. Bullying will continue as long as victims fail to fight back, which will only make the bullies more aggressive. It is possible to respond to violence in a sincere manner by using more peaceful methods as opposed to using force. We should also be aware that teaching kids not to fight back physically does not necessarily mean teaching them to remain silent. Children can count on adult intervention to thoroughly, sternly, and peacefully address violence.
If you look at it the other way around, though, many people would contend that retaliation is frequently an option to take into account, of course, in the event that the child is knowledgeable about self-defense. Today, fighting back is viewed as a way to stand up for yourself. In an interview about this topic, many parents shared the belief that fighting back serves as a deterrent to further aggressiveness: "I don't want my son to be known for fighting, but I also don't want him to be known as the kid who gets pushed around." Additionally, a number of studies involving preschoolers and elementary school age kids indicated that submitting to peers and refraining from retaliation increased children's risk of sustained bullying. We should also be aware that teaching kids to fight back does not necessarily imply teaching them to be violent like the bullies. When force is used, it will have to be done in a controlled manner with the sole aim of self-defense so that violence is expected to decrease to the greatest extent possible.
To conclude, a person's point of view will determine whether or not they should encourage their children to hit back at bullies. However, goodwill attitude should be accelerated when dealing with bullying with the hope that there would be a decrease in violence, resulting in a healthy environment for kids to grow up in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-11 | Nguyen Thanh Bac | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-28 | koichan | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-15 | YESWANTH KALUVA | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | jAnP | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jAnP | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sincere manner" with adverb for "sincere"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... It is possible to respond to violence in a sincere manner by using more peaceful methods as oppos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rent to further aggressiveness: 'I dont want my son to be known for fighting, b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...on to be known for fighting, but I also dont want him to be known as the kid who get...
^^^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... a persons point of view will determine whether or not they should encourage their children to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94582392777 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79700278458 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532731376975 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.0532679923 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.315789474 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3157894737 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249648481179 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770556494614 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588745815622 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163274005878 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373268523992 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.