"It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual."
Innovation, by definition means starting something for the first time in other words, introducing new thing. Some would argue that output of innovations results from group of individual working as a team. But others would say that true innovation comes from an individual’s perception. In my view, true innovation come from the perception of an individual and not from a team with the reasons described below.
To start with, true innovation originates from the mind. Individual has peculiar or unique mind. It follows that, any new thing that is being introduced, have been perceived in the mind of an individual before it’s been implemented physically. This is supported by a common saying “the creation of anything starts in the mind”. For instance, house builders need a building plan in erecting any building on site. Who created the building plan? The builders? definitely no. There must have been a designer, probably an architect who might have “created” the building footprint or master plan in the mind, and translate his perception into drawing, which will guide the builders who will work in accordance with the plan in building the structure. Critically speaking, innovation results from the unique perception of “a single designer” and not from different individuals.
In addition, great innovations that we see today could be traced to an individual who started it and not to a group of people. A very good example is the innovation of telephone. Graham Bells, was the one who invented telephone that is widely used today in serving several purposes. Other examples include several technologies which ranges from internet, google search engine, facebook, Virtual reality and so on, which were all introduced by one person who, definitely, have perceived or conceptualized this as an idea in his mind. That being said, it is evident that true creation of a new thing is not attributed to a team rather, to an individual who first perceive it.
Even though true innovation is as a result of the perception of an individual, it would not be fair to ignore the fact that, the success of any innovation depends largely on the different people, infact could be from different field of study, coming together in order to achieve a goal, which is the implementation of ideas conceived someone. For example, the innovation of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, involves different expert such as programmer, mechanical engineer, electronics engineer and so on, coming together to work on an idea perceived by an individual.
In conclusion, for true innovation results which is “created” from the perception of an individual to come to reality, there is need for “working out” by different individuals who will come together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-12 | TE | 66 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Balqees Bakare | 50 | view |
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain 70
- Fff
- It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation the details may be worked out by a team but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Definitely
...reated the building plan? The builders? definitely no. There must have been a designer, pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent individuals who will come together.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2319.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22297297297 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97066095603 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497747747748 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.3851870367 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.95 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494134751309 0.243740707755 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154348543556 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125727734795 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326074819971 0.150359130593 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888192215926 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Definitely
...reated the building plan? The builders? definitely no. There must have been a designer, pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent individuals who will come together.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2319.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22297297297 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97066095603 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497747747748 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.3851870367 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.95 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494134751309 0.243740707755 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154348543556 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125727734795 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326074819971 0.150359130593 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888192215926 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.