The graph shows the amount of fruit produced in four countries (France, Spain, Germany and Turkey) from 1970 to 2010.
The line graph provides information about how much fruit was produced in some certain countries: France, Spain, Turkey and Germany between 1970 and 2010.
In general, it is immediately apparent that the amounts of fruit made in France and Germany were located in the highest and the lowest position respectively in 1970, and followed a downward trend over a 40-year period. However, in the meantime, the total amount of fruit in Spain and Turkey were on an upward trend and this figure in Spain reached the highest point in 2010.
There was a significant decrease of around 4 million tons of weight of fruit in France; a similar trend was true for the figure in Germany. The amount of fruit produced in France was about 8 million tons more than that in Germany, and this gap did not change much from 1970 to 2010 between the two countries. In 2010, Germany became the country that had the lowest amounts of fruit produced, just above 2 million tons.
In contrast, the amounts of fruit in Spain and Turkey underwent a noticeable increase over a 40-year period. The gap between Spain and Turkey became larger in 1990, Spain produced 4 million tons of fruit more than that in Turkey. In 2010, while the former made 16 million tons of fruit, the latter had exactly 12 million tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-19 | nguyen_thanh_hoa | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ne graph provides information about how much fruit was produced in some certain coun...
^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Germany. The amount of fruit produced in France was about 8 million tons more tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70222222222 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31900361746 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9560774581 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431236866114 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190814181845 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844526833242 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275193413569 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256657190806 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.