Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two maps delineating the renovation of Sunnyhills University camous over a course of time, commencing from 1995 up to present.
Perceptibly, the accommodation has experienced drastic modifications with the myriad of improvements and replacements.
Before the transition, there was a sport area in the left-hand corner with a football pitch, tennis courts and gym. There was a Founder's building in the heart of the campus, which was between the students' union and the Scott library. Additionally, there was a bus stop to the northwest of the students' union. Moreover, Watson building and café were in front of and behind the Founder's building in sequence. Especially, the main reception was part of the Watson building. Likewise, there were two carparks in the top left corner and right-side. Overall, the campus wasn't used entirely with various clusters of trees surrounded.
After being transformed, the Watson building and Founder's building has stayed unchanged but the expansion of the former and the addition of the café to the latter. The two car park have been replaced by the main reception and the table tennis tables respectively reduced to one place and removed to the east. The green area on the left-hand side now has been devoted for the two halls of residence. In the top right-hand corner, there is a students' union which is between the sport area and bus stop on its left and right respectively. Furthermore, there is Scott library behind the students' union. Behind the Founder's building, laboratories are between the arts buildings and recreation area. In the bottom of the campus, there is an appearance of another café surrounded by myriad clusters of trees and next to the pond on its right.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015 78
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- the chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2015 and 2015 67
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the renovation...
^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ner and right-side. Overall, the campus wasnt used entirely with various clusters of ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are a students'?
Suggestion: there are a students
...esidence. In the top right-hand corner, there is a students union which is between the sport area a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11228070175 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85626535353 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1566104543 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0852170664883 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028052434913 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415925679715 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645718744767 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631159321231 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.