In many parts of the world, people now often throw things away when they are broken and buy new ones. Whereas, in the past, things were repaired and used again.
It is becoming increasingly common that instruments are thrown away when they are malfunctioned, and replaced by new ones. This essay will discuss both reasons and issues from the movement.
Shifts in material wealth and lifestyle could be attributable in the way individuals utilizing tools or utensils nowadays. First, as the global economy has developed rapidly in the last decades, people have been richer than ever. Due to this, more well-off buyers these days, in general, can afford purchasing of new products or replacements once their necessities are broken. In addition, advertisements, norms, and temporary pop culture also account for the change in people's attitudes about used products. These factors tend to encourage people to follow the newest trend by attaining brand-new fashion items, technology, and so forth.
There are several negative implications of the change in buyers' behaviors. The first problem is that it wastes societal resources. This is because tools, which are dumped as garbage should be processed before being released to the environment, and the process would cost expenditures to pay for sanitation staff, and equipment operation expenses. Another impact is the production of new goods, which leaves a tremendous amount of carbon footprint in the environment, and is the main culprit of nature's deterioration and pollution of humans' habitats. To illustrate, factories have to ramp up their manufacture of products to meet the increasing demand of today's market, the more they produce the more pollution they contribute to the environment.
In sum, monetary wealth and modern ways of life are the precursors of the development that people change their unused goods. The movement not only costs the resources of societies but exacerbates environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-30 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many countries today if people want to find a job they have to move away from their friends and their families Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 64
- Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to purchase'.
Suggestion: to purchase
...yers these days, in general, can afford purchasing of new products or replacements once th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5071942446 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96186491176 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665467625899 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6691938343 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0999833919366 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302648719766 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364437398907 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600169435049 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325853725666 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.