Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Personally, I fully agree that it matters for government to put the budget on the education of very young children than on universities. Based on the 3 reasons, I will elaborate why I contend that allocating more resources to young children can bring about a more successful development than doing so to universities.
To begin with, it is curiosity that drives people to explore the unknown aspect or knowledge and the most key and crucial period during the growth of young children is beyond 12. Curiosity can help us to glean more information which we are interested in, drive us to ask question which may be beneficial to some tough predicaments we meet, and push us to explore the infinity of this complex society. That is, if we want to achieve the goal that the development of all systems in a country is intact and compound, we might assure that everyone in the society is full of curiosity and energetic to excavate every possibility to innovate and create. Only by strengthening the education of this aspect beyond 12 could we cultivate the children as a teen always be curious about external and internal things and phenomenons, which is a key personal trait to make a country better. This is my first argument.
Second, the children between 5 to 10 are more open to every potential possibilities of future. Their are still copious of ways they can choose for their bright future. In my opinion, variety is very critical to the development of a country. Putting resources on children can assure the way of their interest not to be narrow; instead, they can try to contact or experience more jobs or information and then find out what intrigues them. However, if the government choose to allocate more budget to universities, we can imagine that the professional aspect of some technique will become more stronger and potent. This might be a merit in short-turn. Nevertheless, in long-turn, variety of jobs can really help a country to go farther and healthier, instead of only few aspect becoming the top.
Last but not least, there are some horrible crimes and rub appearing every day. If we can utilize more budget to educate young kids when potential bad children have gone so far, we can decrease the rate of juvenile delinquency even the crime rate in the upcoming future. For this aspect, spending money on the young children seems more efficient and effective than on universities. This is another interesting point of penetration to see the influence of the decision.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that government should allocate budget to young children than universities so that the development of a country can be more successful and bright. Given the three reasons I mentioned above, it is more beneficial to do it.
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 70
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 73
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 73
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...very potential possibilities of future. Their are still copious of ways they can choo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...al aspect of some technique will become more stronger and potent. This might be a merit in sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, then, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89721627409 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85376235453 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494646680942 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6017801612 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.35 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.35 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234718673615 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763532179105 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880631242 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16312577755 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800237387301 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...very potential possibilities of future. Their are still copious of ways they can choo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...al aspect of some technique will become more stronger and potent. This might be a merit in sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, then, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89721627409 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85376235453 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494646680942 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6017801612 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.35 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.35 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234718673615 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763532179105 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880631242 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16312577755 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800237387301 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.