Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspapers and TV has bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is perceived that the detailed criminal depiction reported in the media has a detrimental impact on viewers; therefore, it should be limited. From my perspective, I wholeheartedly agree with this statement as it hinders numerous hazardous concerns.
There are a number of compelling reasons why perpetrators should not be reported meticulously, one of which is to provoke copycat behavior. Indeed, the particular portrayal of crime via the media may inspire other culprits to breach rules in a similar fashion. This would therefore increase advanced methods learnt from former criminal descriptions in conducting other cases. For instance, Nguyen Duc Nghia, who committed a heinous crime, cut off and hid each part of his ex-girlfriend's body in different locations after killing her, which made it particularly challenging for the police to uncover the facts and then was presented widely in the media. Following this misdeed, a number of other cases with comparable tricks that are even more sophisticated have occurred in recent years.
Another justification for my view is that the detailed presentation of delinquents via the mass media might adversely affect people’s psyche. In fact, reconstructing the crime places too much emphasis on negative aspects, thereby exacerbating the victim’s trauma and causing extreme emotional and psychological distress to their relatives, especially when they are no longer alive. In addition, the over-presentation of crimes might lead to a form of moral panic among the general public. In fact, there appears to be a correlation between media consumption and fear of crime. Due to the sense of insecurity after reading these perpetrator’s depictions through the press or televisions, they tend to distrust the community and limit connections with others. As a result, it could lead to an indifferent community where people are not willing to support others in need.
In sum, I completely oppose the idea of giving such criminal reporting on the press and TV because it triggers copycat crimes and people’s fear reflexes. It is advisable that the details of the crimes should be banned to mitigate its adverse impacts on viewers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-08 | Bùi Thị Thúy Hiền | 89 | view |
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population countries should make use of edible insects as food However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but negatively affect nature too What are the benefits and drawbacks of eat 89
- Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspapers and TV has bad influences so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population countries should make use of edible insects as food However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but negatively affect nature too What are the benefits and drawbacks of eat 84
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population countries should make use of edible insects as food However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but negatively affect nature too What are the benefits and drawbacks of eat 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... inspire other culprits to breach rules in a similar fashion. This would therefore increase advanced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...lead to a form of moral panic among the general public. In fact, there appears to be a correla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f moral panic among the general public. In fact, there appears to be a correlation...
^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this perpetrator' or 'these perpetrators'?
Suggestion: this perpetrator; these perpetrators
...o the sense of insecurity after reading these perpetrator’s depictions through the press or telev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41228070175 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10528656063 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637426900585 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7680564485 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.4 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160376284296 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055130220933 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454903338335 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110538676114 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040941416692 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.