More people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but the quality of work. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent years, there is an increasing number of people approving employers should take a great care about working efficiency of employees, rather than clothes. It is my belief that the way the worker dress is not totally important, I also argue that clothes could be vital to some extent.
On the one hand, clothes play a crucial role in workplace for various reasons. Firstly, clothes might enhance the responsibility within staffs of the company effectively. To illustrate, the majority of airlines accommodate air hosts with their own uniform. Thanks to it, the flight attendants may become more dedicated with customers because they are aware of themselves being on behalf of the airline. Secondly, uniform also strengthens the solidarity among the company. These days, there are a significant number of discrimination among co-workers regardless of their social standing. To tackle, wearing the similar clothes can emphasize the equal among workers in company.
On the other hand, clothes should be taken for granted in some occupations. The first reason must be the comfort among staffs of the company. For example, wearing formal clothes is widely considered irritating with people working in office during six or seven hours. Therefore, the office employees should be exempt from formal clothes. Dressing without restriction can bring about the inspiration, which is vital in many jobs. In fashion industry, the company leader always encourages their workers to dress as stylish as possible in order to trigger their creativity. As a result, many successful collections were made unexpectedly by free styles in the workplace.
In conclusion, although clothes should be utilized for improving responsibility and solidarity in the company, some companies should let employees dress freely for feeling annoyed and creating inspiration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-13 | minhhuy1000 | 78 | view |
- These days more and more people are going to other countries for a significant period of time either to find a job or to study There are main benefits to doing this but people who live abroad can also face some difficulties Discuss the advantages AND disa 67
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that schools should teach students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- These days more and more people are going to other countries for a significant period of time either to find a job or to study There are main benefits to doing this but people who live abroad can also face some difficulties Discuss the advantages AND disa 67
- People nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past What do you think is the reason behind this What are the effects on individuals and people around them 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48421052632 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8682788741 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617543859649 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5758517758 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9411764706 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220942991324 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615111229227 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474500411386 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139152699602 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462197941848 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.