The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps depicts several considerabble changes in the industrial area of the Norbiton town from present to the future planned development.
Overall, according to the town’s description at the present time, the complex of the area is simple, while the blueprint of the future planned town is witnessed to have more facilities than that of the prelude idea in the present.
It is immediately apparent that the number of infrastructures in the future is anticipated a dramatic increase, with the emergence of shops, medical centre, playground. There is also a farmland built in east of the town, while in the present, it was set up in the north of the town. The position of the town remain still and unchanged in the future. In addition, the number of constructed factories in the future will be seen to decline slightly, from 8 to 7 in the quantity. Compared to both description, factory will be replaced and school will be built as the alter. The town's authority is kick off a plan for rebuilt and improve the roads. To illustrate this, the future plan describes that there will be three roads added to the town. However, nowadays, the construction of roads or avenue remains simplificated.
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 84
- The graph below shows the number of library books read by boys and girls at Starmouth school from 2006 to the present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below shows information about honey bee colonies and honey production in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'depict'.
Suggestion: depict
The maps depicts several considerabble changes in the in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... future planned development. Overall, according to the town’s description at t...
^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...be replaced and school will be built as the alter. The towns authority is kick off a plan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'towns'' or 'town's'?
Suggestion: towns'; town's
... school will be built as the alter. The towns authority is kick off a plan for rebuil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90147783251 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90077102969 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7472050481 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179893191933 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728077557627 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712410408101 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156233040104 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691173716074 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.