The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25-year-olds in London during the 1990s and the 2010s, and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts and the table show 25-year-olds’ accommodation and the availability of different types of housing in London during the 1990s and the 2010s. Since 2010 the less number of 1-2 bedroom houses and flats has reduced the housing choices for this age group.
Shared accommodations has become the most common types of housing in London for 25-year-olds in the 2010s. In the 1990s, less than half of those surveyed were living in shared houses or flats. In the 2010s, this number has grown to around 75 percent of 25-year-olds. The higher number could be due to the increase of larger houses and flats during this period.
There was also a drop in the number of people living alone. In the 1990s, around a quarter of 25-year-olds lived alone in London. Since 2010 this figure has decreased because of the reduction in the availability of 1-2 bedroom houses or flats. In the 1990s, there were 34000 1-2 bedroom houses and 32000 1-2 bedroom flats available. These firgures have dropped to 12000 and 10000 from 2010 onwards.
Finally, living with parent have become less common. There was a reduction in the number of 25-year-olds living with parents from a third in the 1990s to under a quarter in the 2010s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-04 | congatrongbietnoi2222 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | sapphireng | 86 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the 2010s. Since 2010 the less number of 1-2 bedroom houses and flats has redu...
^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number has grown to around 75 percent of 25-year-olds. The higher number could be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80952380952 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55699653745 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452380952381 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9204172263 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6923076923 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1538461538 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338435420026 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139501653968 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193662765652 0.0843802449381 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22785557404 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110972949353 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.