Some think that printed books are not necessary in the digital era, because all writing can be stored electronically. Others think printed books still play an important role. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Technological advancement has allowed readers to view books online via electronic devices. Thus, numerous people suppose that physical books are now excessive while others would advocate that printed books are extremely critical. This essay will elaborate on both views and argue in favour of the latter.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that storing books online rather than printing them may bring about several benefits. The first worth-mentioning fact perhaps is that tangible books are more difficult to reserve compared to intangible ones. This is because printed papers are likely to fade over time and can be ripped off easily if they are not well protected. By contrast, online books can be stored on your tablets or smartphones and thus, they remain the same quality regardless of used time. Furthermore, online books can be more convenient to carry around. For example, when university students have to bring their textbooks to the campus, e-books can come in handy since the students only need to bring their gadgets which have access to their online books storage.
On the other hand, printed books have positive impacts which are unreplaceable in our daily lives. It is true that physical books are accesible anytime and anywhere since they does not require Internet connection or technological devices to access. This is a great advantage to students or workers locating in the remote areas. In addition, reading printed books can prevent readers from getting distractions from online notifications or messages, which commonly appear in electronic gadgets. In result, readers can increase their concentration and productivity while reading documents.
In conclusion, many individuals support the idea that online papers should replace printed ones while I believe that tangible books and documents have tremendously positive effects that we should embrace.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-21 | hyst12 | 78 | view |
2023-03-21 | hyst12 | 78 | view |
2021-09-28 | lennie.butera | 61 | view |
2021-09-24 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Mobile phone and the internet could have many benefits for old people However this age group uses technology the least What are the benefits for old people of using mobile phones and the internet How can we encourage them to use this new technology 61
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 78
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people say the government should give healthcare the first priority some others believe there are more important priorities to spend the taxpayers money Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...cesible anytime and anywhere since they does not require Internet connection or tech...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oductivity while reading documents. In conclusion, many individuals support th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45547945205 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73016095708 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599315068493 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4930844047 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26193500815 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921805709974 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468512311566 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158335368612 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540723956868 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.