Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers anymore. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that with the development of technology, the ways we to read books, news, etc have changed, so it this is not necessary to produce more papers. I strongly agree with this idea.
To begin with, there are various reasons why to convince that the paper should be changed to another form. The primary reason is having a mutation for people to approach. Because of the prosperity of science and technology, it allows individuals to stay up-to-date on things that are happening in the world. For example, students can use implication to search for the mark on the examination and it is also easier to enroll in the new school instead of face-to-face. As a result, papers do not play an important role like the past so we can reduce the risk.
As mentioned, paper products can lead to danger to the environment and habitat, especially deforestation. Trees are the main ingredient to make paper so the more paper produced, the more trees are cut. In the past, the government was criticized because of that, we also have many debates which are discussing how to protect the environment. However, the result has deteriorated so there are compelling reasons to replace paper. Thus,Internet and technological gadget are the new source which the substitute paper
In summary, in my opinion, the printed branch still exists but people will be aware of the consequence of this and hence later and sooner, it will be replaced by technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Internet
...ompelling reasons to replace paper. Thus,Internet and technological gadget are the new so...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, still, thus, for example, in summary, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84423833123 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595141700405 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2901091568 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0740498405033 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269436486001 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331145352356 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0443349443666 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183437229945 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.